Analysis Capital markets Legal and IP News

Analysis: the logic behind SBF’s defense of following legal advice

sam bankman fried SBF

Today Sam Bankman-Fried’s (SBFs) lawyers filed a letter reiterating plans to use an ‘advice-of-counsel’ defensein the FTX fraud trial. In order for the Government to argue its case, it has to prove fraudulent intent beyond a reasonable doubt. If someone can demonstrate they relied on advice in good faith, that might undermine the Government’s case.

But there’s a second potential reason which is quite particular to the SBF case. One of FTX’s key lawyers was Dan Friedberg, who has a colorful past. A long time ago, he worked for a company embroiled in an online poker scam which allowed a few people to see the poker cards of other players. Friedberg provided controversial advice to the poker firm on how to minimize exposure. A secret recording of the discussions is available on YouTube.

Before joining FTX, Friedberg was a partner at Fenwick & West, advising SBF and his companies from 2017 to 2019. The law firm continued to be FTX and Alameda outside counsel after Friedberg joined the companies – he worked for both.

Article continues …

subscriber padlock

Want the full story? Pro subscribers get complete articles, exclusive industry analysis, and early access to legislative updates that keep you ahead of the competition. Join the professionals who are choosing deeper insights over surface level news.


Image Copyright: SALT